Trader stories
Evidence from marked workbooks, not star ratings
These accounts reference specific sessions, chart habits, and outcomes. One includes a reservation — we learn from misses as much as wins.
I attended the February workshop after six months of fading every gap up on SET. The volume rank column alone changed my mornings. I still lost on one continuation day — I had marked fade out of habit — but the debrief showed exactly where I skipped the pre-market checklist.
— Krit P., independent intraday trader, Gap Analysis Workshop
Chart review with Siriwan was uncomfortable in the best way. She circled three entries where my stop was inside the noise zone. The follow-up charts she emailed matched my actual mistakes, not generic examples.
— Arnon T., two chart review sessions, April–May
Study group keeps me honest on Thursdays. Defending a fade bias aloud when everyone else sees continuation is useful — even when I am wrong. The shared notes after each session are worth the monthly fee.
— Mei L., study group member since January
Our desk booked corporate training last quarter. The customized briefing template still hangs in the room. Junior analysts now use the same gap vocabulary in morning meetings. Setup took two weeks of back-and-forth, which felt slow at the time but the deck matched our symbols.
— Vorapol S., head of research, regional prop desk
The workbook is thorough and the room is quiet enough to think. I wish the flagship workshop ran twice a month — the wait between sessions meant I drifted back to old habits for a few weeks. That is on me, not them, but spacing matters if you are impulsive.
— Dana R., workshop participant, mild reservation noted
Case note: First month after the workshop
Trader profile: Part-time SET index trader, office job until 08:30, trades 09:30–11:30.
Starting habit: Entered on gut feeling at the open without a written bias. Journal existed but columns were inconsistent.
Intervention: Gap Analysis Workshop in March, then two chart review sessions in April.
Process change: Adopted the seven-column journal from the workbook. Pre-open bias required before opening the brokerage platform. Laminated continuation card on desk.
Observed change (self-reported, eight weeks): Classification errors down from roughly four per week to one to two. No measure of profitability — trader tracks process adherence instead. Missed one continuation day by fading against checklist rules; used debrief notes to adjust pre-market volume threshold.
This is one participant's account, not a typical results claim. Outcomes vary with execution, size, and instrument.